#### further reading http://www.liquidfeedback.org/
#### ( http://www.public-software-group.org/mercurial http://www.public-software-group.org/liquid_feedback
#### http://www.public-software-group.org/liquid_feedback_core
#### http://www.public-software-group.org/liquid_feedback_frontend
#### http://www.public-software-group.org/mercurial/liquid_feedback_frontend/raw-file/tip/INSTALL.html )
######## it may have usefulnesses.  maybe even liftable code.  says it's opensource.



if level 2 provides (via 3x3) 9 states, not counting weightings, then level 3, should provide... how many, by how many?  25, via 5x5?   OR  4x4 (16 positions), forcing /off/ the middle way again.  maybe one 45axis would fit 4s and the other 5s... not sure.  i like the idea of keeping both, in sync.

ok, so what could the key questions be.

can you continue to tease out pertinent, prominent, fitting and telling questions, for each encrement... or do you need to jump to a 


lets see if i can first depict the 9.

F=authoritarian (F for Fascistic)
A=libertarian (A for Anarchic)
M=maybefest
L=left
R=Right

so the 9 are:

       F
   FL     FR
L      C      R
   AL     AR
       A


F = 0% personal freedom, 0% economic freedom; 0% freedom, 50%LR
FL= 50% personal freedom, 0% economic freedom; 
FR= 0% personal freedom, 50% economic freedom; 
L = 100% personal freedom, 0% economic freedom;
C = 50% personal freedom, 50% economic freedom; 50% freedom, 50%LR
R = 0% personal freedom, 100% economic freedom;
AL= 100% personal freedom, 50% economic freedom;
AR= 50% personal freedom, 100% economic freedom;
A = 100% personal freedom, 100% economic freedom; 100% freedom, 50%LR


characteristically elaborated:


F = 0% personal freedom, 0% economic freedom; 0% freedom, 50%LR

all the fruits of your efforts are taken and put towards ensuring you have no freedom.


FL= 50% personal freedom, 0% economic freedom;

half of your freedom is gone, to ensure you have no say over your individual economics.


FR= 0% personal freedom, 50% economic freedom; 

half of the wealth generated by your labour goes to ensuring you have no freedom.


L = 100% personal freedom, 0% economic freedom;

all your efforts go toward ensuring your freedom.


C = 50% personal freedom, 50% economic freedom; 50% freedom, 50%LR

maybe.  half of your income is used to take half of your freedom to do what you want.


R = 0% personal freedom, 100% economic freedom;

all your personal freedom is used up, work or die.  everything you do is for money.  life is cheap.


AL= 100% personal freedom, 50% economic freedom;

half your economic effort goes into ensuring you're free.


AR= 50% personal freedom, 100% economic freedom;

half your personal freedom is used up by necessity of chasing money.


A = 100% personal freedom, 100% economic freedom; 100% freedom, 50%LR



this is still just an initial rough jot-down attempt at a quick grok (to help people past confusion by what's meant by the likes of "economic freedom".)
will refine and expand this, such that each position can be depicted from every other position.   .... that's only 81 definitions, right?  (i'll check the maths on that later).

by refinement, i mean for attempt at both consistency and neutrality.   ... neutrality will fail, multiple times in attempting to find it, and the failed attempts will likely fall precisely (if not, near) on the other perspectives.




